The Broadstone Together Submission to the Dublin City Development Plan 2022 - 2028

Unique Reference Number: 
DCC-C43-MA-337
Status: 
Submitted
Author: 
Broadstone Together
No. of documents attached: 
27
Author: 
Broadstone Together

Observations

Volume 3 - Zoning maps

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

Motion 01878(MOT-01878), as referenced in the Chief Executive’s Report on Motions received following Submissions made on the Draft Dublin City
Development Plan 2022 - 2028, stated that Damer Court's zoning would be preserved as Z15. Indeed, the retention of this zoning was also recommended by the CE. It is the view of the Broadstone Together group that the Z15 zoning for this site should indeed be preserved, as Damer Court is a Christian residential institution for self-sufficient and assisted living and we believe Z15 zoning will preserve this use. The rezoning as suggested in the Proposed Material Alterations is in error.

Chapter 3: Climate action

The Broadstone Together group explicitly supports all material alterations suggested under Material Alteration Numbers 3.7, 3.10, 3.15, 3.20, 3.24 and 3.28

Chapter 12: Culture

The Broadstone Together group explicitly supports all material alterations suggested under Material Alteration Numbers 12.5, 12.20, 12.24, 12.35 and 12.36.

Chapter 4: Shape and structure of the city

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

Motion MOT-01602 requests that Phibsborough is added to Section 4.5.1 as:

Chapter 4 Section: 4.5.1 Approach to the Inner City and Docklands Page: 139, Policy SC1 To amend the following: SC1 Consolidation of the Inner City To consolidate and enhance the inner city, promote compact growth and maximise opportunities provided by existing and proposed public transport by linking the critical mass of existing and emerging communities such as Docklands, Heuston Quarter, Grangegorman, {Phibsborough,} Stoneybatter, Smithfield, the Liberties and the North East Inner City with each other, and to other regeneration areas.

In their response to this motion, the CE mentions that "Phibsborough is an urban village and is considered to form part of the inner suburbs rather than the inner city.".

The CE furthermore refers to the definition of the "inner city" given in the Glossary:

“Inner city (see also city centre): The inner city is bounded on the northside by the North Circular Road, Phibsborough Road, the Royal Canal, North Strand Road and East Wall Road, and on the southside by the South Circular Road, Suir Road, the Grand Canal from Dolphin Road to Grand Canal Street Upper, Bath Avenue, Londonbridge Road, Church Avenue and Beach Road (See Map K)."

A number of conflicting errors are being made by the CE here. Phibsborough comprises three neighbourhoods: Shandon, Broadstone and Mountjoy. While Shandon indeed lies outside the inner city bounds, Broadstone and Mountjoy certainly do not and lie entirely within these bounds along the Phibsborough Road and Royal Canal Bank. Map K indeed confirms this, as does an independent Neighbourhood Mapping Project by the Dublin Inquirer (see image below indicating the boundaries of Phibsborough as per 28 separate submissions).

Furthermore, the CE's recommendation appears to indicate a lack of awareness of where Phibsborough is located. The alteration recommended by  the CE states is as follows:

It is the recommendation of the CE to agree the motion with amendments. For clarity, amendment to Chapter 4 Shape and Structure of the City, Section: 4.5.2 Approach to the Inner Suburbs and Outer City as part of the Metropolitan Area, page 139, first paragraph to read:
The inner suburbs comprise the established suburban communities {, largely,} located outside of the canal belt {e.g. such as Phibsborough,} and the outer city refers to the newly developing areas on the fringe of the city administrative area including Clongriffin-Belmayne, Ashtown-Pellestown, Park West and Cherry Orchard.

Phibsborough is not "largely located outside the canal belt". It is in fact entirely located within the canal belt. The adjacent area outside the canal belt is Glasnevin, not Phibsborough.

In the current draft Development Plan there is significant ambiguity about what urban area Broadstone and Mountjoy are part of. While they are considered by the CE to be part of the Phisbsborough KUV, they are also a part of the inner city as per the Development Plan's definition.

A compromise solution would perhaps be to make the following material alteration:

Chapter 4 Section: 4.5.1 Approach to the Inner City and Docklands Page: 139, Policy SC1 To amend the following: SC1 Consolidation of the Inner City To consolidate and enhance the inner city, promote compact growth and maximise opportunities provided by existing and proposed public transport by linking the critical mass of existing and emerging communities such as Docklands, Heuston Quarter, Grangegorman, {Broadstone, Mountjoy,} Stoneybatter, Smithfield, the Liberties and the North East Inner City with each other, and to other regeneration areas.

image-20220831230454-1.png

 

Chapter 4: Shape and structure of the city

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

This submission is linked to the Broadstone Together submission on Material Alteration Number 4.2 and Motion MOT-01602.

The material alteration suggested here is a result of a confusing recommendation to MOT-01602. It should be noted that by any definition, including Map K, that Phibsborough is not "largely located outside the canal belt". It in fact lies entirely within the canal belt. It therefore cannot be regarded as an inner suburb as per the definition of the Development Plan.

Chapter 13: Strategic Development Regeneration Areas (SDRAs)

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

In Table 13.1, the "Capacity" and "Area" of SDRA 8 is incongruous with the equivalent values in Table 2.8 of Section 2.3.1, Chapter 2.

Table 13.1 should be amended as follows:

SDRA 8

Grangegorman/Broadstone

800

10

Bus Connects

Chapter 15: Development standards

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

The Broadstone Together group welcomes the material alteration to remove the inner city as a location to facilitate the provision of Build to Rent. However, in the interest of promoting diverse typologies in all of Dublin, BTR should not be explicitly facilitated in the remaining locations and the following should be entirely removed from the text:

  • Within 500 metre walking distance of a high employment area i.e. more than 500 employees per hectare.
  • Within 500 metres of major public transport interchanges (e.g. Connolly Station, Tara Street Station and Heuston Station), and
  • Within identified Strategic Development Regenerations Areas.

 

Chapter 5: Quality housing and sustainable neighbourhoods

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

The Broadstone Together group welcomes the material alteration to remove the inner city as a location to facilitate the provision of Build to Rent. However, in the interest of promoting diverse typologies in all of Dublin, BTR should not be explicitly concentrated in the remaining locations:

The following text should be entirely removed from Section 5.5.7 page 184-185:

{BTR should be concentrated in areas of high intensity employment use, within 500m of major public transport interchanges  and within identified Strategic Development Regeneration.}

The following text should be entirely removed from Section 5.5.7 page 186:

  • (Within the Inner City (i.e. within the canal ring)).  
  • Within 500 metre walking distance of a high employment area i.e. more than 500 employees per hectare.
  • Within 500 metres of major public transport interchanges (e.g. Connolly Station, Tara Street Station and Heuston Station), and
  • Within identified Strategic Development Regenerations Areas.

Chapter 7: The city centre, urban villages and retail

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

It is unclear from any previous CE reports why the "Markets Area Public Realm Plan 2021" is being removed by this material alteration. A public realm plan for the Markets Area is supported by the Broadstone Together group and support for such should be explicitly stated in the Development Plan.

Volume 3 - Zoning maps

Please select the Proposed Material Alteration on which you are commenting:: 

An Oige is a hugely important site for the Broadstone community. The zoning matter has been discussed among residents and also among councillors. At the last meeting on the Development Plan, councillors sent a suggestion to split the zoning of the site to public consultation:

  • The building was to remain as Z15
  • The car park in the rear was to be rezoned to Z2.

In response, the Broadstone Basin Residents Association, part of the Broadstone Together initiative, conducted a brief survey of the residents who live on the streets behind An Oige. The summary results of this survey can be viewed below:

Of the 26 respondents to the survey

  • 46.2% of respondents desire to keep the zoning of the entire site as Z15
  • 46.2% of respondents desire to split the zoning between Z2 and Z15
  • 7.7% of respondents desire to rezone the entire site to Z2

The survey also captured residents opinions about this zoning matter. These have been anonymised and attached to this submission for your review.

image-20220901155202-1.png

Information

Unique Reference Number: 
DCC-C43-MA-337
Status: 
Submitted
No. of documents attached: 
27